*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 65701 ***

                         Transcriber's Notes

    1. Typographical errors and hyphenation inconsistencies were
       corrected.

    2 The text version is coded for italics and other mark-ups i.e.,
       (a) Italics are indicated thus _italic_;
       (b) Smallcaps thus +CAPS+:

                   *       *       *       *       *

                               WHY NOT?

                        A BOOK FOR EVERY WOMAN.

                            The Prize Essay

               TO WHICH THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
                        AWARDED THE GOLD MEDAL
                             FOR MDCCCLXV.

                                  BY

                    HORATIO ROBINSON STORER, M.D.,

                              OF BOSTON,

Assistant in Obstetrics and Medical Jurisprudence in Harvard University;
          Surgeon to the New England Hospital for Women; and
          Professor of Obstetrics and the Diseases of Women
                     in Berkshire Medical College.

            ISSUED FOR GENERAL CIRCULATION, BY ORDER OF THE
                     AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

            _Casta placent superis. Casta cum mente venito,
                Et manibus puris sumito fontis aquam._

                                BOSTON:
                           LEE AND SHEPARD.
                                 1866.


      Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1866, by

                           LEE AND SHEPARD,

          In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the
                      District of Massachusetts.


At the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association,
held at Boston in June, 1865, it was, upon recommendation of the
Section on Practical Medicine and Obstetrics,--

 _Resolved_, That the Committee on Publication be requested to
 adopt such appropriate measures as will insure a speedy and general
 circulation of the Prize Essay written for women; provided this can
 be done without expense to the Association.




                               CONTENTS.


                                +PAGE+

  +PREFATORY REMARKS+                                                  5

     I. Origin and Purpose of the Present Essay                       11

    II. What has been done by Physicians to Foster,
        and what to Prevent, the Evil                                 15

   III. What is the True Nature of an Intentional
        Abortion when not Requisite to Save the
        Life of the Mother                                            27

    IV. The Inherent Dangers of Abortion to a Woman's
        Health and to her Life                                        36

     V. The Frequency of Forced Abortions, even among
        the Married                                                   62

    VI. The Excuses and Pretexts that are given for the
        Act                                                           70

   VII. Alternatives, Public and Private, and Measures
        of Relief                                                     74

  VIII. Recapitulation                                                79

  +APPENDIX.+--Correspondence                                         88




                          PREFATORY REMARKS.


It will be noticed that in the following Essay, the recipient of the
special prize for 1864–5 of the American Medical Association, its
author makes frequent reference, as to those of another, to his own
previous labors. This circumstance, now that his identity has been
revealed, might at first seem an infringement of the rules of good
taste. In the facts, however, that he felt compelled to take unusual
pains to conceal that identity prior to the decision of the Committee,
with all of whose members he has long enjoyed intimate acquaintance,
and that little other published material as yet exists, from which to
draw upon this subject, save his own, he places his excuse, and throws
himself upon the generous sympathy and forbearance of his readers.

The Essay, when placed in the hands of the Committee, was accompanied
by the following statement, which it may not be out of place to
reproduce at the present time:--

"The writer, knowing nothing of the project to elicit a direct and
effective appeal to women upon the subject of criminal abortion, until
after it had been decided at the New York meeting,[1] has long been
a member of the Association. He is aware, from personal observation,
that induced miscarriage is of very frequent occurrence, and that its
effects are to the last degree disastrous to the country at large. He
has seen the change that has been effected in professional feeling
upon the subject as to the need that this depopulation, or rather
prevention of repopulation of the country, should be arrested, since
the publication of the Report of the Association's Special Committee,
which was appointed at Nashville in 1857.

"It is, perhaps, presumptuous for him to undertake a task so strongly
appealing to all one's eloquence, sympathy, and zeal, and for the
proper performance of which there exist so many gentlemen in the
profession better qualified than himself. He does it, however, as the
passing traveller in distant lands, by casting his pebble upon the pile
of similar contributions that mark a single wayside grave, helps raise
a monument to warn of danger and to tell of crime, in the hope that
this waif of his may, perchance, effect somewhat toward arousing the
nation to the countless fœtal deaths intentionally produced each day in
its midst, and to prevent them.

"The Association has empowered the Prize Committee to award the premium
of the present year to the best popular tract upon the subject of
induced abortion. The writer presents the accompanying paper neither
for fame nor for reward. It has been prepared solely for the good of
the community. If it be considered by the Committee worthy its end,
they will please adjudge it no fee, nor measure it by any pecuniary
recompense. Were the finances of the Association such as to warrant
it in more than the most absolutely necessary expenditures, yet would
the approbation of the Committee, and of the profession at large, be
more grateful to the writer than any tangible and therefore trivial
reward.

"It is a singular and appropriate coincidence that the action of
the Association, originating as it did from Boston, in 1857, and
recognizing in no uncertain language, alike by the resolutions that
were formally adopted by the Louisville Convention, and by the memorial
presented by its President to the different legislative assemblies
and State Medical Societies of the Union, the necessity of a radical
change as to the popular estimate of the crime,--should now culminate
and become effective at a meeting of the Association in Boston, by
an authorized appeal in behalf of the profession to the community,
which alone makes and enforces the laws, till now a dead letter as
regards abortion, and which alone commits, palliates, and suffers from
the crime. It it is an equally striking and appropriate coincidence
that the Chairman of the Committee, at whose hands the selection of
that appeal must be made, though the Committee had been chosen for a
general purpose before it had been decided by the Association to elicit
essays upon this special subject, should be the physician who, in New
England, first appreciated the frequency of criminal abortions, pointed
out their true character, and denounced them.

"If this Essay prove successful, its author only asks that the seal
which covers his identity may not be broken until the announcement is
made upon the platform of the Convention, pledging himself that this is
but for a whim of his own, and that he is well, and he trusts favorably
known, by many of the best men of the Association throughout the
Union."[2]

There is one point, in connection with the present Essay, to which I
feel bound, in fairness alike to my professional brethren and to those
for whom I have now written, to direct attention.

As every author who has decided opinions, and is alive to their
importance, must naturally and very necessarily do, I have incidentally
taken occasion to express myself upon certain collateral topics, but
only in so far as they were directly connected with, and germane to,
the main subject under discussion. Such statements are all of them to
be considered merely as expressions of my own individual opinion, and
not as the views, necessarily, of the mass of the profession.

An instance of the kind referred to is where I allude to the advantages
of giving anæsthetics in child-bed, even though the labor is what is
termed a natural one; and I adduce correspondence upon this subject in
an appendix to the Essay.

As upon some of these questions physicians honestly differ among
themselves, I have thought this disclaimer alike due to others and to
myself; they are matters, however, only incidental to the Essay, upon
the general subject of which the profession are wholly unanimous in
opinion.

  +HOTEL PELHAM, BOSTON+,
  April, 1866.




                               WHY NOT?

                        A BOOK FOR EVERY WOMAN.


I.--_Origin and Purpose of the Present Essay._

At the meeting of the American Medical Association, held at New York,
in 1864, it was, after mature deliberation, decided to issue "a short
and comprehensive tract, for circulation among females, for the purpose
of enlightening them upon the criminality and physical evils of forced
abortions."

The source of this Essay is, therefore, in itself, well worthy
attention. The Association referred to represents the medical
profession of America, for it is composed of delegates, and only of
delegates, from every regularly organized hospital, medical society,
and medical college throughout the land, its members being, therefore,
almost all of them gentlemen advanced in years, of extended experience,
and of acknowledged reputation. That they should unanimously have
concurred in recommending any measure is, so far, proof that it was
needed.

There are those, perhaps, who may suppose that in advising that
pregnancies, once begun, should be allowed to go on to their full
period, physicians are actuated by a selfish motive. On the contrary,
it will be shown that miscarriages are often a thousand fold more
dangerous in their immediate consequences, and, therefore, more
decidedly requiring medical treatment, than the average of natural
labors; that they are not only frequently much more hazardous to life
at the time, but to subsequent health, their results in some instances
remaining latent for many years, at times not showing themselves until
the so-called turn of life, and then giving rise to uncontrollable and
fatal hemorrhage, or to the development of cancer, or other incurable
disease. It is in reality the physician's province, indeed, it is his
sacred duty, to prevent disease as well as to cure it, and this, even
though it must plainly lessen the business and the emoluments that
would otherwise fall into his hands. Would women listen to the appeal
now to be made them, an immense deal of ill-health would be prevented,
and thousands of maternal as well as fœtal lives would annually be
saved.

And, moreover, in the fact that the profession thus transcends, almost
for the first time, upon any matter in this country, the barrier which
for mutual protection, both of science and the community, has always
been allowed to stand, and directly addresses itself to the judgment
and to the hearts of women upon a question vital to themselves and to
the nation, there is afforded most conclusive evidence that the subject
is of the highest importance, that the step now taken is a necessary
one, and the motives that prompt it sincere.

To women, on the other hand, how interesting the topic! It is one that
affects, and more directly, perhaps, than can anything else, their
health, their lives. It concerns their discretion, their conscience,
their moral character, their peace of mind, even its very possession,
for cases of insanity in women from the physical shock of an induced
abortion, or from subsequent remorse, are not uncommon. It involves
often all the elements of domestic happiness, the extent or existence
of the home circle, the matron's own self-respect, and often the very
gift or return of conjugal love; for, as has forcibly been asserted of
marriage where conception or the birth of children is intentionally
prevented, such is, in reality, but legalized prostitution, a sensual
rather than a spiritual union.

Who can deny these premises? The experience of every physician confirms
them, as do a glance throughout every circle of society, and the
experience, personal or by observation, of almost every nurse, every
matron, every mother. Let us then, physicians and the community,
meet each other half way--ready to acknowledge, upon due evidence,
the frightful extent of the evil that exists in our homes--an evil,
in part occasioned by ignorance and carelessness, and that we are
both, in a measure, accountable for, and should be ready to assist
each other in its cure. I propose to show that induced abortions
are not only a crime against life, the child being always alive, or
practically supposed to be so; against the mother, for the laws do
not allow suicide, or the commission of acts upon one's own person
involving great risk to life; against nature and all natural instinct,
and against public interests and morality, but that, barring ethical
considerations, and looked at in a selfish light alone, they are so
dangerous to the woman's health, her own physical and domestic best
interests, that their induction, permittal, or solicitation by one
cognizant of their true character, should almost be looked upon as
proof of actual insanity.


II.--_What has been done by Physicians to Foster, and what to Prevent,
this Evil._

In our appeal we shall endeavor to go straight towards the mark,
nothing concealing, undervaluing, or selfishly excusing. And, first of
all, what part have physicians had in this great tragedy, wherein so
many women have been chief players? For it is to the medical attendant
that the community have a right to look for counsel, for assistance,
and for protection, and the present is an evil more especially and
directly coming within these bounds.

From time immemorial such have been the deplorable tendencies of
unbridled desire, of selfishness and extravagance, of an absence of
true conjugal affection, there has existed in countless human breasts a
wanton disregard for fœtal life, a practical approval of infanticide.
This has, however, in the main been confined either to savage tribes,
or to nations, like the Chinese, with a redundant population, with each
of whom the slaughter of children after their birth is common, or to
the lowest classes of more civilized communities, impelled either by
shame, or, as in the burial clubs of the London poor, the revelations
of which a year or two since so startled the world, by the stimulus of
comparatively excessive pecuniary gain.

That infanticide is of occasional occurrence in our own country, the
effect of vice or of insanity, has long been known; instances being
occasionally brought to the surface of society, and to notice by the
police, and through courts of law.

The closely allied crime of abortion also dates back through all
history, like every other form or fruit of wickedness, originating
in those deeply-lying passions coeval with the existence of mankind.
Till of late, however, even physicians, who from time to time have
accidentally become cognizant of an isolated instance, have supposed or
hoped (and here the wish was father to the thought), that the evil was
of slight and trivial extent, and therefore, and undoubtedly with the
feeling that a thing so frightful and so repugnant to every instinct
should be ignored, the profession have, until within a few years,
preserved an almost unbroken silence upon the subject.

Some ten years since, this matter was thoroughly taken in hand by
a physician much interested in the diseases of women, the younger
Dr. Storer, of Boston, with the frank acknowledgment that it was to
his father, the Professor of Midwifery in Harvard University, that
the credit of initiating the anti-abortion movement in New England
was justly due. Prof. Hodge, of Philadelphia, like the elder Dr.
Storer, had previously commented, in a public lecture to his class,
afterwards printed, upon the immorality and frequency of induced
miscarriage; and in Europe one or two physicians of eminence, as Dr.
Radford, had endeavored to arouse the profession to the real value
of fœtal life. The subject had also received some slight attention
in works upon medical jurisprudence, but in special treatises upon
abortion and sterility, their causes and treatment, of which the most
celebrated has been that of Dr. Whitehead, of England, the chance of
this occurrence and condition being dependent upon a criminal origin
had been almost entirely lost sight of. In investigating the cases
of disease in the better classes that came under observation, it was
now ascertained that a very large proportion of them were directly
owing to a previous abortion, and that in many of them this occurrence
had been intentional; the physician's consultation room proving in
reality a confessional, wherein, under the implied pledge of secrecy
and inviolate confidence, the most weighty and at times astounding
revelations are daily made. In such instances as those to which we are
now referring, the disclosures are in answer to no idle curiosity, but
to the necessity which always exists of knowing and understanding
every point relating to the causation, the treatment, the cure of
obscure disease.

The profession were soon aroused to an appreciation of facts, whose
existence it was shown could so easily be proved by every physician,
and in 1857 a Committee, consisting of some of the more prominent and
most reliable practitioners in various parts of the country, with the
younger Storer as Chairman, was appointed by the American Medical
Association, at its meeting in Nashville, to investigate the crime with
a view to its possible suppression.[3] The report of this Committee was
rendered at Louisville, in 1859, and, supported as it was by a mass of
evidence of almost boundless scope, the measures proposed, chiefly of
a legislative character, were unanimously indorsed by the Association.
The evidence upon which the report was based was subsequently
published at Philadelphia, as a separate volume, "the first of a series
of contributions to Obstetric Jurisprudence" by its writer, under the
title of "Criminal Abortion in America," and was feelingly dedicated
"to those whom it may concern--Physician, Attorney, Juror, Judge, and
Parent."

This detail, otherwise out of place in an appeal to the community,
is rendered perhaps necessary, that an exact and true impression may
be given of the steps that have been taken by medical men to redeem
themselves from the imputation of having been sluggish guardians of the
public weal. Since the time of the Louisville report, the profession
have been fully alive to the claims of the subject, and it is not with
unnatural satisfaction that its author, in a subsequent publication,[4]
has taken occasion to observe that the importance and legitimacy of
the investigation has now been acknowledged in the current files of
every medical journal, in the published transactions of the national
and minor medical associations, in many medical addresses, as that by
Dr. Miller, of Louisville, at the meeting of the Association at New
Haven, in 1860, over which he presided, and in nearly every general
obstetric work of any importance issued in this country since that
date, Bedford's Principles and Practice of Obstetrics, for instance,
and in many works of criminal law and medical jurisprudence, as Elwell,
Wharton and Stillé, and Hartshorne's edition of Taylor, to a much
greater extent than the subject in these works had ever been treated
before.

I am constrained to acknowledge my indebtedness to the various
publications of the writer from whom I have quoted, for much of the
evidence I shall now present upon the subject of forced abortions. I
trust that thus offered it may lose none of its freshness, point, and
force. My frequent extracts from one who has given more thought to the
subject than probably any other person in the country, will, I am sure,
need no excuse.

An opinion has obtained credence to a certain extent, and it has
been fostered by the miserable wretches, for pecuniary gain, at once
pandering to the lust and fattening upon the blood of their victims,
that induced abortions are not unfrequently effected by the better
class of physicians. Such representations are grossly untrue, for
wherever and whenever a practitioner of any standing in the profession
has been known, or believed to be guilty of producing abortion, except
absolutely to save a woman's life, he has immediately and universally
been cast from fellowship, in all cases losing the respect of his
associates, and frequently, by formal action, being expelled from all
professional associations he may have held or enjoyed.

The old Hippocratic oath, to which each of his pupils was sworn by
the father of medicine, pledged the physician never to be guilty of
unnecessarily inducing miscarriage. That the standard, in this respect,
of the profession of the present day has not deteriorated, is proved by
the first of the resolutions adopted by the Convention at Louisville,
in 1859: "That while physicians have long been united in condemning
the procuring of abortion, at every period of gestation, except as
necessary for preserving the life of either mother or child, it has
become the duty of this Association, in view of the prevalence and
increasing frequency of the crime, publicly to enter an earnest and
solemn protest against such unwarrantable destruction of human life."[5]

It is true, however, that while physicians are unanimous as to the
sanctity of fœtal life, they have yet to a certain extent innocently
and unintentionally given grounds for the prevalent ignorance upon this
subject, to which I shall soon allude. The fact that in some cases of
difficult labor it becomes imperatively necessary to remove the child
piecemeal, if dead, or, if living, to destroy it for the sake of saving
the mother's life, ought not to imply that the physician has attached
a trifling value to the child itself. Compared with the mother, who
is already mature and playing so important a part in the world, he
justly allows the balance to fall, but he fully recognizes that he is
assuming a tremendous responsibility, that his action is only justified
by the excuse of dire necessity, and he suffers, if he is a man of any
sensibility and feeling, an amount of mental anguish not easily to be
described, and that none of us, who have been compelled to so terrible
a duty, need feel ashamed to confess.

There are cases again, where, during pregnancy, the patient may be
reduced by the shock of severe and long-continued pain or excessive
vomiting, and its consequent inanition, to the verge of the grave. In
such instances, it has been supposed that abortion was necessary to
preserve the woman's life. The advance of science, however, has now
shown that this procedure is not only often unnecessary, but in reality
unscientific; the disturbances referred to occurring, as they generally
do, in the earlier months of gestation, being owing not to the direct
pressure of the womb upon the stomach or other organs, but to a
so-called reflex and sympathetic disturbance of those organs, through
the agency of the nervous system; and that a cure can in general be
readily effected without in any way endangering the vitality of the
child.

There are other instances that might be cited, cases of dangerous
organic disease, as cancer of the womb, in which, however improbable
it might seem, pregnancy does occasionally occur; cases of insanity,
of epilepsy, or of other mental lesion, where there is fear of
transmitting the malady to a line of offspring; cases of general
ill-health, where there is perhaps a chance of the patient becoming an
invalid for life; but for all these, and similar emergencies, there
is a single answer, and but this one--that abortion, however it may
seem indicated, should never be induced by a physician upon his own
uncorroborated opinion, and, in a matter so grave, affecting, with
his own reputation, the life of at least one, if not of a second
human being, every man worthy of so weighty and responsible a trust
will seek in consultation a second opinion. This is a matter of such
importance to the welfare of the community, that long ago the law
should have provided for its various dangers, and should wisely have
left it to no man's discretion or purity of character to withstand the
tremendous temptations which must be allowed to here exist. The law now
provides, in one or more at least of our States, that the certificate
of a single physician, no matter what his skill or standing, cannot
commit a patient to the often necessary and beneficial seclusion of
a lunatic asylum; two are required. How much more requisite is it
that in the question we are now considering, to one mode of deciding
which the physician may be prompted by pity, by personal sympathy, the
entreaties of a favorite patient, and not seldom by the direct offer of
comparatively enormous pecuniary compensation, the law should offer him
its protecting shield, saving him even from himself, and helping him
to see that the fee for an unnecessarily induced or allowed abortion
is in reality the price of blood. As a class, it cannot be gainsaid
that physicians of standing will spurn with indignation the direct
bribe; let them look to it that they never carelessly permit what they
condemn, by endeavoring to bring on the woman's periodical discharge
when it is possible that she may have conceived, or by carelessly
passing an instrument into her womb without ascertaining whether or no
it contain the fruit of impregnation, or by allowing the completion
of a miscarriage that may threaten or even have commenced, without
resorting to every measure, of whatever character, that can possibly
result in its arrest, and the consequent completion of the full period.


III.--_What is the True Nature of an Intentional Abortion when not
Requisite to Save the Life of the Mother._

There are those who will be influenced by evidence presented from
abstract morality and religion. To such I shall first address myself.
There are others who care nothing for ethical considerations, and
who arrogate to themselves a right to decide as to the morality of
taking or destroying the life of an unborn child. For these, also, I
have an unanswerable argument--their own self-interest--an appeal to
which will usually arrest the most hardened adept in other crime, much
more these intelligent and otherwise innocent women, who have mostly
erred through ignorance and a misapprehension of their own physical
condition, and their own physical dangers, their own physical welfare.

Physicians have now arrived at the unanimous opinion, that the fœtus in
utero is _alive_ from the very moment of conception.

"To extinguish the first spark of life is a crime of the same nature,
both against our Maker and society, as to destroy an infant, a child,
or a man."[6]

More than two hundred years ago the same idea was as vigorously as
quaintly expressed: "It is a thing deserving all hate and detestation
that a man in his very originall, whiles he is framed, whiles he is
enlived, should be put to death under the very hands and in the shop of
nature."[7]

The law, whose judgments are arrived at so deliberately, and usually
so safely, has come to the same conclusion, and though in some of its
decisions it has lost sight of this fundamental truth, it has averred,
in most pithy and emphatic language, that "quick with child, is having
conceived."[8]

By that higher than human law, which, though scoffed at by many a
tongue, is yet acknowledged by every conscience, "the wilful killing of
a human being, at any stage of its existence, is murder."[9]

Abortion or miscarriage is known by every woman to consist of the
premature expulsion of the product of conception. It is not as well
known, however, if the statements of patients are to be relied upon,
that this product of conception is in reality endowed with vitality
from the moment of conception itself. It is important, therefore, to
decide in what the moment of conception consists. It has now been
ascertained that every variety of animal life originates from an egg,
even primarily those lowest forms in which occur the phenomena of
so-called alternate generation; in each and every one of them, mammals
or invertebrates, the origin is from as distinct an egg as is laid
by bird, tortoise, or fish; the human species being no exception to
this general rule. Before this egg has left the woman's ovary, before
impregnation has been effected, it may perhaps be considered as a
part and parcel of herself, but not afterwards. When it has reached
the womb, that nest provided for the little one by kindly nature,
it has assumed a separate and independent existence, though still
dependent upon the mother for subsistence. For this end the embryo is
again attached to its parent's person, temporarily only, although so
intimately that it may become nourished from her blood, just as months
afterwards it is from the milk her breasts afford. This is no fanciful
analogy; its truth is proved by countless facts. In the kangaroo,
for instance, the offspring is born into the world at an extremely
early stage of development, "resembling an earthworm in its color and
semi-transparent integument,"[10] and then is placed by the mother
in an external, abdominal, or marsupial pouch, to portions of which
corresponding, so far as function goes, at once to teats and to the
uterine sinuses, these embryos cling by an almost vascular connection,
until they are sufficiently advanced to bear detachment, or in reality
to be born. The first impregnation of the egg, whether in man or in
kangaroo, is the birth of the offspring to life; its emergence into
the outside world for wholly separate existence is, for one as for the
other, but an accident in time. It has been asserted by some authors,
as by Meigs, that conception is only coincident with the attachment
of the impregnated egg to the uterine cavity for its temporary abode
therein, or, in exceptional cases, as in extra-uterine pregnancy
so called, with its attachment to some other tissue of the mother;
thereby attempting to establish a difference between impregnation and
conception; a difference that is at once philosophically unfounded,
and plainly disproved by all analogical evidence, as the fact, for
instance, that in most fishes impregnation occurs entirely external to
the body of the mother, from which the ova had previously, or during
the process of copulation, permanently been discharged.

Many women suppose that the child is not alive till quickening has
occurred, others that it is practically dead till it has breathed. As
well one of these suppositions as the other; they are both of them
erroneous.

Many women never quicken at all, though their children are born living;
others quicken earlier or later than the usual standard of time; or,
others again may, in their own persons, have noticed either or all of
these peculiarities in different pregnancies. Quickening is in fact
but a sensation, the perception of the first throes of life--but of a
twofold occurrence, and this not merely the motion of the child, but
often the sudden emergence of the womb upwards from its confinement in
the low regions of the pelvis into the freer space of the abdomen. The
motions of the child, which have been proved by Simpson, of Edinburgh,
to be its involuntary efforts, through the reflex action of its nervous
system, to retain itself in certain attitudes and positions essential
to its security, its sustenance, and its proper development, are
usually present for a period long prior to the possibility of their
being perceived by the parent. They may very constantly be recognized
by the physician in cases where no sensation is felt by the mother, and
the fœtus has been seen to move when born, during miscarriage, at a
very early period.

During the early months of pregnancy, while the fœtus is very small
in proportion to the size of the cavity which contains it, sounds,
produced by its movements, may be distinguished by the attentive ear
applied to the abdomen of the mother, as gentle taps repeated at
intervals, and continued uninterruptedly for a considerable time. These
sounds may sometimes be heard several weeks before the usual period
of the mother's becoming conscious of the motion of the child, and
also earlier than the pulsations of the fœtal heart or the uterine
souffle,[11] as the murmur of the circulation in the walls of that
organ, or in the tissue of the after-birth, is technically termed.
These motions must be allowed to prove life, and independent life.
In what does this life really differ from that of the child five
minutes in the world? Is not, then, forced abortion a crime? Moreover,
instances have occurred where, the membranes having been accidentally
ruptured, the child has breathed, and even cried, though yet unborn,
as proved alike by the sounds within the mother, well authenticated by
bystanders, and by auscultation of her abdomen, and by the fact that
sometimes, when not born living, the lungs of the fœtus have been found
fully expanded, a process which can be effected only by respiration,
and of which the proofs are such as can be occasioned in no other way
whatever.

In the majority of instances of forced abortion, the act is committed
prior to the usual period of quickening. There are other women, who
have confessed to me that they have destroyed their children long
after they have felt them leap within their womb. There are others
still, whom I have known to wilfully suffocate them during birth, or to
prevent the air from reaching them under the bedclothes; and there are
others, who have wilfully killed their wholly separated and breathing
offspring, by strangling them or drowning them, or throwing them into a
noisome vault. Wherein among all these criminals does there in reality
exist any difference in guilt?

I would gladly arrive at, and avow any other conviction than that
I have now presented, were it possible in the light of fact and
of science, for I know it must carry grief and remorse to many an
otherwise innocent bosom. The truth is, that our silence has rendered
all of us accessory to the crime, and now that the time has come to
strip down the veil, and apply the searching caustic or knife to this
foul sore in the body politic, the physician needs courage as well as
his patient, and may well overflow with regretful sympathy.

That there has existed a wide and sincere ignorance of the true
character of the act, I have already allowed; it is a point to which
I shall again refer. At present let us turn from the crime against
the child, to the crime as against the mother's own life and health.
I here refer more particularly to her own agency therein. Of the
guilt of abortion when committed by another person than herself, and
with reference both to the mother's life and that of the child, there
can be no doubt, but it is to the woman's own agency in the act, as
principal, or accessory by its solicitation or permission, that we have
now to deal; not as to its abstract wrong alone, but as to its physical
dangers, and therefore its utter folly.


IV.--_The Inherent Dangers of Abortion to a Woman's Health and to her
Life._

It is generally supposed, not merely that a woman can wilfully throw
off the product of conception without guilt or moral harm, but that
she can do it with positive or comparative impunity as regards her own
health. This is a very grievous and most fatal error, and I do not
hesitate to assert, from extended observation, that, despite apparent
and isolated instances to the contrary--

1. A larger proportion of women die during or in consequence of an
abortion, than during or in consequence of childbed at the full term
of pregnancy;

2. A very much larger proportion of women become confirmed invalids,
perhaps for life; and,

3. The tendency to serious and often fatal organic disease, as cancer,
is rendered much greater at the so-called turn of life, which has very
generally, and not without good reason, been considered as especially
the critical period of a woman's existence.

These, as I have said, are conclusions that cannot be gainsaid, as they
are based on facts; and that these facts are merely what ought, in the
very nature of things, to occur, can readily enough be shown.

1. Nature does all her work, of whatever character it may be, in
accordance with certain simple and general laws, any infringement of
which must necessarily cause derangement, disaster, or ruin.

In the present instance, it has been ascertained, by careful
dissections and microscopic study, that the woman's general system,
both as a whole and as regards each individual organ and its tissues,
is slowly and gradually prepared for the great change which naturally
occurs at the end of nine months' gestation; and that if this change
is by any means prematurely induced, whether by accident or design,
it finds the system unprepared. Not even do I except from this law
the earlier months of pregnancy, when it is thought by so many that
abortion can be brought on without any physical shock.

During pregnancy all the vital energies of the mother are devoted to
a single end: the protection and nourishment of the child. Such wise
provision is made for its security, such intimate vascular connection
is established between the fœtal circulation and the blood-vessels of
the mother, that its premature rupture is usually attended by profuse
hemorrhage, often fatal, often persistent to a greater or less degree
for many months after the act has been completed, and always attended
with more or less shock to the maternal system, even though the full
effect of this is not noticed for years.

In birth at the full period, it is found that what is called by
pathologists fatty degeneration of the tissues, occurs both in the
walls of the mother's womb, and in the placenta or after-birth, by
which attachment is kept up with the child. This change, in all other
instances a diseased process, is here an essential and healthy one. By
it the occurrence of labor at its normal period is to a certain extent
determined; by it is provision made against an inordinate discharge of
blood during the separation and escape of the after-birth, and by it is
the return of the uterus to the comparatively insignificant size, that
is natural to it when unimpregnated, insured. Any deviation from this
process at the full term, which prevents the whole chain of events now
enumerated from being completed, lays the foundation of, and causes a
wide range of uterine accidents and disease, displacements of various
kinds, falling of the womb downwards or forwards or backwards, with the
long list of neuralgic pains in the back, groins, thighs, and elsewhere
that they occasion; constant and inordinate leucorrhœa; sympathetic
attacks of ovarian irritation, running even into dropsy, &c., &c. These
are only a portion of the results that might be enumerated.

Now, while all this is true of any interference with the natural
process at the full time, it is just as true, and if anything more
certain, when pregnancy has been prematurely terminated; and out of
many hundred invalid women, whose cases I have critically examined, in
a very large proportion I have traced these symptoms, to the mental
conviction of the patient, as well as to my own, directly back to an
induced abortion.

Again--not merely does nature prepare the appendages of the child and
the womb of its mother for the separation that in due time is to ensue
between them, it also provides an additional means of insuring its
successful accomplishment through the action that takes place in the
woman's breasts, namely, the secretion of the milk. Though the escape
of this fluid does not ordinarily occur in any quantity until some
little time after birth has been effected, yet the changes that ensue
have gradually been progressing for days, or weeks, or even months;
for, as is well known, in some women the lacteal secretion is present
before birth, at times even during a large part of pregnancy, and in
all women there is doubtless a decided tendency of the circulation
towards the breasts, prior to the birth of the child, just as there
has been so extreme a tendency of the circulation for so long a time
towards the womb. It is indeed to take the place of the latter that
the former is established, and to prevent the evil consequences that
might otherwise ensue. The sympathy between the mammary glands and
the uterus is now well established; it is shown in many different
ways: in some women the application of the child to the breasts is
immediately followed by after-pains, and in others these pains, which
are usually but contractions of the womb to expel any clots that may
have accumulated, are attended by a freer secretion or discharge of
the milk. It is not uncommon, when the monthly discharge is scanty
or suddenly checked, for the breasts to become enlarged and painful,
as is so often the case soon after impregnation, while, on the other
hand, one of the most efficient means we have of establishing the
periodical flow, when suppressed, is by the application of sinapisms
to the surface of the breasts. In view of these facts it will
readily be understood why it is that women who make good nurses are
so much less likely than others to suffer from the various disorders
of the womb, and why they are also less likely to rapidly conceive,
and why, moreover, too long lactation should not be indulged in for
either of these so desirable ends. The demands of fashion shorten or
prevent nursing, the demands of fashion often forbid a woman from
bearing children; but whether this is attained by the prevention
of impregnation, or by the induction of miscarriage, it is almost
inevitably attended, as is to a certain extent the sudden cessation of
suckling, by a grievous shock to the mother's system, that sooner or
later undermines her health, if even it does not directly induce her
death.

I have asserted that dangers attend the occurrence of abortion which
directly threaten a mother's life. This is true of all miscarriages,
whether accidental or otherwise; but these dangers are enhanced when
the act is intentional. When caused by an accident, the disturbance
is often of a secondary character, the vitality of the ovum being
destroyed, or the activity of the maternal circulation checked, before
the separation of the two beings from each other finally takes place.
But in a forced abortion there is no such preservative action; the
separation is immediate if produced by instruments, which often besides
do grievous damage to the tissues of the mother with which they are
brought into contact, lacerating them, and often inducing subsequent
sloughing or mortification; or, if the act is effected by medicines,
it is usually in consequence of violent purgation or vomiting, which
of themselves often occasion local inflammation of the stomach or
intestines, and death. Add to this that even though the occurrence of
any such feeling may be denied, there is probably always a certain
measure of compunction for the deed in the woman's heart--a touch of
pity for the little being about to be sacrificed--a trace of regret for
the child that, if born, would have proved so dear--a trace of shame
at casting from her the pledge of a husband's or lover's affection--a
trace of remorse for what she knows to be a wrong, no matter to what
small extent, or how justifiable, it may seem to herself, and we
have an explanation of the additional element in these intentional
abortions, which increases the evil effect upon the mother, not as
regards her bodily health alone, but in some sad cases to the extent
even of utterly overthrowing her reason.

The causes of an immediately or secondarily fatal result of labor
at the full period are few; in abortion nearly every one of these
is present, with the addition of others peculiar to the sudden and
untimely interruption of a natural process, and the death of the
product of conception. There is the same or greater physical shock,
the same or greater liability to hemorrhage, the same and much greater
liability to subsequent uterine or ovarian disease. To these elements
we must add another, and by no means an unimportant one; a degree of
mental disturbance, often profound, from disappointment or fear, that
to the same extent may be said rarely to exist in labors at the full
period.[12]

Viewing this subject in a medical light, we find that death, however
frequent, is by no means the most common or the worst result of the
attempts at criminal abortion. This statement applies not to the mother
alone, but, in a degree, to the child.

We shall perceive that many of the measures resorted to are by no means
certain of success, often indeed decidedly inefficacious in causing the
immediate expulsion of the fœtus from the womb; though almost always
producing more or less severe local or general injury to the mother,
and often, directly or by sympathy, to the child.

The membranes or placenta may be but partially detached, and the ovum
may be retained. This does not necessarily occasion degeneration, as
into a mole, or hydatids, or entire arrest of development. The latter
may be partial, as under many forms, from some cause or another, does
constantly occur; if from an unsuccessful attempt at abortion, would
this be confessed, or indeed always suggest itself to the mother's own
mind? Fractures of the fœtal limbs, prior to birth, are often reported,
unattributable in any way to the funis, which may amputate, indeed,
but seldom break a limb. A fall or a blow is recollected; perhaps it
was accidental, perhaps not, for resort to these for criminal purposes
is very common. In precisely the same manner may injury be occasioned
to the nervous system of the fœtus, as in a hydrocephalic case long
under the writer's own observation, where the cause and effect were
plainly evident. Intrauterine convulsions have been reported; as
induced by external violence they are probably not uncommon, and the
disease thus begun may eventuate in epilepsy, paralysis, or idiocy.

To the mother there may happen correspondingly frequent and serious
results. Not alone death, immediate or subsequent, may occur from
metritis, hemorrhage, peritonitic, or phlebitic inflammation, from
almost every cause possibly attending not merely labor at the full
period, comparatively safe, but miscarriage increased and multiplied by
ignorance, by wounds, and violence; but if life still remain, it is too
often rendered worse than death.

The results of abortion from natural causes, as obstetric disease,
separate or in common, of mother, fœtus, or membranes, or from a morbid
habit consequent on its repetition, are much worse than those following
the average of labors at the full period. If the abortion be from
accident, from external violence, mental shock, great constitutional
disturbance from disease or poison, or even necessarily induced by the
skilful physician in early pregnancy, the risks are worse. But if,
taking into account the patient's constitution, her previous health,
and the period of gestation, the abortion has been criminal, these
risks are infinitely increased. Those who escape them are few.

In thirty-four cases of criminal abortion reported by Tardieu, where
the history was known, twenty-two were followed, as a consequence, by
death, and only twelve were not. In fifteen cases necessarily induced
by physicians, not one was fatal.

It is a mistake to suppose, with Devergie, that death must be
immediate, and owing only to the causes just mentioned. The rapidity
of death, even where directly the consequence, greatly varies; though
generally taking place almost at once if there be hemorrhage, it may
be delayed even for hours where there has been great laceration of
the uterus, its surrounding tissues, and even of the intestines; if
metro-peritonitis ensue, the patient may survive for from one to four
days, even, indeed, to seven and ten. But there are other fatal cases,
where on autopsy there is revealed no appreciable lesion, death, the
penalty of unwarrantably interfering with nature, being occasioned by
syncope, by excess of pain, or by moral shock from the thought of the
crime.

That abortions, even when criminally induced, may sometimes be safely
borne by the system, is of little avail to disprove the evidence of
numberless cases to the contrary. We have instanced death. Pelvic
cellulitis, on the other hand, fistulæ, vesical, uterine, or between
the organs alluded to; adhesions of the os or vagina, rendering
liable subsequent rupture of the womb, during labor or from retained
menses, or, in the latter case, discharge of the secretion through a
Fallopian tube, and consequent peritonitis; diseases and degenerations,
inflammatory or malignant, of both uterus and ovary; of this long
and fearful list, each, too frequently incurable, may be the direct and
evident consequence, to one patient or another, of an intentional and
unjustifiable abortion.

We have seen that, in some instances, the thought of the crime,
coming upon the mind at a time when the physical system is weak and
prostrated, is sufficient to occasion death. The same tremendous
idea, so laden with the consciousness of guilt against God, humanity,
and even mere natural instinct, is undoubtedly able, where not
affecting life, to produce insanity. This it may do either by its
first and sudden occurrence to the mind, or, subsequently, by those
long and unavailing regrets, that remorse, if conscience exist, is
sure to bring. Were we wrong in considering death the preferable
alternative?[13]

To the above remarks it might truthfully be added, that not only is
the fœtus endangered by the attempt at abortion, and the mother's
health, but that the stamp of disease thus impressed is very apt to
be perceived upon any children she may subsequently bear. Not only
do women become sterile in consequence of a miscarriage, and then,
longing for offspring, find themselves permanently incapacitated for
conception, but, in other cases, impregnation, or rather the attachment
of the ovum to the uterus, being but imperfectly effected, or the
mother's system being so insidiously undermined, the children that are
subsequently brought forth are unhealthy, deformed, or diseased. This
matter of conception and gestation, after a miscarriage, has of late
been made the subject of special study, and there is little doubt that
from this, as the primal origin, arises much of the nervous, mental,
and organic derangement and deficiency that, occurring in children,
cuts short or embitters their lives.

It may be alleged by those who, sceptical or not sceptical as to these
conclusions, have reason, nevertheless, to desire to throw discredit
upon them, that the weekly or annual bills of mortality, the mortuary
statistics, do not show such direct influence from the crime of
abortion as I have claimed exists.

On the other hand, it must not be forgotten that in these cases there
is always present every reason for concealment. In the earlier months
of pregnancy it is very difficult to prove, in the living subject, that
pregnancy has occurred. Such a conclusion being arrived at, before
the sound of the fœtal heart can be heard, for this is the only sign
that is positively certain, by merely circumstantial and probable
evidence, which becomes of weight only as it is accumulated and found
corroborative. In the dead subject, the victim of an abortion in
the earlier months, the case is often equally obscure, or at least
doubtful, unless the product of conception has not yet escaped, or,
having been thrown off, has been detected or preserved. When found,
it of course proves pregnancy, whether the parent be living or dead;
that is, in the former instance, if its discharge can be traced
directly to the woman in question, and to no other, and correlative
circumstances may show that an abortion has occurred; but this may
have been accidental and guiltless. Where the act has been committed
by an accomplice, the proofs of such commission and of the intent,
though this is generally implied by the act itself, are by no means
always forthcoming. Where the abortion has been induced by the woman
herself, as is now so frequently the case, certainty upon the point
becomes far more difficult. The only positive evidence by which to
judge of the real frequency of the crime is _confession_, and it is
from the confessions of many hundreds of women, in all classes of
society, married and unmarried, rich and poor, otherwise good, bad, or
indifferent, that physicians have obtained their knowledge of the true
frequency of the crime.

The confidential relations in which the physician stands to his
patient; the understanding that nothing can wring from him her
disclosures, save the direct commands of the law, so unlikely in
any given case to become cognizant of its existence, elicits from a
woman in almost every instance, especially if she believes herself in
peril of death, a frank statement of the means by which she has been
brought low; for it is evident that upon such knowledge must depend
the measures of relief to which the physician may resort. Could the
test of confession be always applied, as is, however, manifestly
impossible, so many women die during or in consequence of an abortion,
without the attendance of a physician and without making any sign, it
would be found that many of the cases now reported upon our bills of
mortality as deaths from hemorrhage, from menorrhagia, from dysentery,
from peritonitis, from inflammation of the bowels or of the womb, from
obscure tumor, or from uterine cancer, would be found in reality to
be deaths from intentional abortion. At first sight, it would seem
impossible that such grossly erroneous opinions as the above could
be rendered; but their likelihood is readily perceived when it is
recollected how often, when the best medical skill has been secured,
attending circumstances are such as to excite little or no suspicion of
the true state of the case, and a physical examination of the patient
is therefore neglected. Women are still allowed to die of ovarian or
of other tumors that might be easily and successfully removed, and, in
default of a proper examination, are sometimes mistakenly pronounced
instances of disease of the liver or of ordinary abdominal dropsy, and
as such are buried. If such and similar errors can occur in chronic
cases, where time and opportunity have permitted the most thorough
examination and study, still more likely are they to take place during
the hurry and anxieties of an acute and alarming attack, where the
conscience and shame of the patient are alike interested in causing or
keeping up a deception.

It will have been seen, then, not merely that an induced abortion may
be attended with great immediate danger to the mother, but that in
reality it is very often fatal, either from the so-called shock to her
system, or from hemorrhage, or from immediately ensuing peritonitis.

                   *       *       *       *       *

2. Should the woman survive these immediate consequences, no matter how
excellently she may have seemed to rally, she is by no means safe as to
her subsequent health. There are a host of diseases, some of them very
dangerous, to which she is directly liable.

The product of conception is not always entirely gotten rid of. If a
fragment remains, no matter how trifling in size, it may serve as the
channel of the most severe and constant hemorrhagic discharge. Of this,
examples are by no means infrequent; the flux lasting at times for very
many months, and, if the cause is not finally detected and removed,
hurrying the patient to her grave.

The product of conception is sometimes retained entire, after its
detachment from the uterine walls has been supposed wholly effected.
It may be carried for many years, always acting as a foreign body; at
times occasioning extreme irritation, shown perhaps only by distant
and otherwise inexplicable symptoms, or it may lie dormant for a time
without apparent trouble--finally making itself known by some sudden
explosion of disease, whether by purulent absorption and general
pyæmia; by ulceration and discharge of fœtal debris, through the
intestines, bladder, or even abdominal integuments; or, by metritic
inflammation, followed by sympathetic or consequent fatal peritonitis.

The patient, after an abortion, is very liable to one or another of
the forms of uterine displacement, which are now known to lie at the
foundation of so very large a proportion of the lame backs, formerly
supposed consequent on spinal irritation; of the painfully neuralgic
breasts, so often suggestive of incipient cancer; of the disabled
limbs, pronounced affected with sciatica, cramps, or even paralysis;
of the impatient bladders, from whose irritability or incontinence
the kidneys are supposed diseased; of the obscure abdominal aches and
pains, which unjustly condemn so many a liver and so many an ovary;
of the constipation from mere mechanical pressure, which is so often
thought to argue stoppage from stricture or other organic disease; of
the severe and intractable headaches that, resisting all and every
form of direct or constitutional treatment, are supposed to indicate
an incurable affection of the brain; of the easily deranged stomachs,
that are so suggestive of ulceration or of malignant degeneration; of
the general hypochondria and despondency, that of the most gentle,
even almost angelic, dispositions make the shrew and virago, and of
the purest and most innocent produce, in her own conceit, the worst of
sinners, even at times effecting suicide. Who that has suffered will
think this picture overdrawn? Who that has practised will not recognize
in displacements, the key by which these riddles may be solved?

Their mode of causation is plain. After an abortion, just as after
labor at the full term, the womb is more weighty than natural--its
walls thicker and heavier than usual, alike by the excess of blood
they contain, and by the increased deposition of muscular fibre. After
childbed, it has been shown that this increase is normally lessened
by certain physiological processes attending the natural completion
of that function. After an abortion, these processes are absent or
are but imperfectly performed. It is notorious that during the slight
increase of weight from simple congestion that occurs at the regular
monthly periods, women are very liable to displacement on any effort,
extreme or slight, whether riding on horseback, gently lifting, or
even straining at stool; during or after an abortion, the risk is very
greatly increased.

With equal justice could I refer to the chances of trouble that
otherwise accompany the premature ending of pregnancy. In many
instances, I have now been summoned to attend, and frequently to
operate upon, the consequences of local uterine or vaginal inflammation
or of laceration, for both of these results may ensue where the womb
has not been prepared to evacuate itself by the normal closure of
pregnancy--and this, whether or not instruments may have been employed.
Adhesions of varying situation and extent are not uncommon as the
result of an abortion. They may be slight, and merely tilt or draw
the womb to one side, giving rise only to severe local or distant
neuralgias, and rendering the occurrence of a subsequent pregnancy
somewhat dangerous; they may be more decided, and as bridles or septa
partially close the canal of the vagina, rendering menstruation and
conjugal intercourse alike difficult and painful; they may be so
complete as entirely to obliterate the mouth of the womb or of the
external passage, in these instances preventing the escape of the
menses, and rendering an operation necessary to avoid a rupture that
might perhaps be fatal. Should it be the outer entrance that is
occluded, the woman is of course entirely shut off from her husband's
embrace; an effect that, however grateful to many an invalid, her shame
would hardly be willing to accept as the consequence of disease.

These that I have mentioned are but a tithe of the pathological effects
daily revealed to physicians, as in consequence of an intentional
abortion. They are, however, sufficient for our purpose.

                   *       *       *       *       *

3. But not only is a woman in peril both as to life and health, alike
at the time of an abortion and for months or years subsequently. She
may seem to herself and to others successfully to have escaped these
dangers, and yet when she has reached the critical turn of life,
succumb.

At this eventful period, when the fountains of youth dry up, and the
scanty circulation is turned from its accustomed channel, the woman
ceases from the periodical discharges, which in health and with care
are the secret of her beauty, her attractions, her charms. At its
occurrence not merely is a change produced in the system generally,
but the womb, no longer required, becomes atrophied and dwindles into
insignificance. It may have had impressed upon it, years and years
back, the stamp of derangement, till now not rendered effective; for,
as in other portions of the body, a part once weakened may retain
itself in tolerably good condition until some accident or other change
develops or awakens the seed of disease. Thus it is that an ancient
hypertrophy, or a chronic irritation, may become scirrhous and
degenerate into undoubted carcinoma, or chronic menorrhagia or uterine
leucorrhœa become intractable hemorrhage, or a latent fibroid deposit
develop into an irrepressible, and, perhaps, irremediable tumor.

Little the comfort for a woman to have had her own way against the
dictates of her conscience, the advice, perhaps, of her physician,
if to the dangers she must directly incur, she must add the looking
forward through all the rest of her life to possible disease,
invalidism or death as the direct consequence of her folly; no wonder
if she should consider prevention better than such cure as this,
and yet the prevention of pregnancy, by whatever means it may be
sought, by cold vaginal injections, or by incomplete or impeded sexual
intercourse, is alike destructive to sensual enjoyment and to the
woman's health; her only safeguard is either to restrict approach to a
portion of the menstrual interval, or to refrain from it altogether.

Not merely are certain of the measures to which I have alluded
detrimental to the health of the woman, they are so to both parties
engaged, and it is to their frequent employment, freely confessed
as this is to the physician, that much of the ill health of the
community, both of men and women is to be attributed. Though they may
seem sanctioned by the rites of marriage, they are in some respects
worse for the physical health, I might almost say for the moral health
likewise, than illicit intercourse or even prostitution, for they bring
both parties down to all the evils and dangers, mental and physical, of
self-abuse.


V.--_The Frequency of Forced Abortions, even among the Married._

All are familiar with the fact, to be perceived everywhere upon the
most casual scrutiny, that the standard size of families is not on
the average what used to be seen; in other words, that instances of
an excess over three or four children are not nearly as common as we
know was the case a generation or two back. No one supposes that men or
women have, as a whole, so deteriorated in procreative ability as this
might otherwise seem to imply.

There can be but one solution to the problem, either that pregnancies
are very generally prevented, or that, occurring, they are prematurely
cut short. We have seen that countless confessions prove that this
surmise is true.

In the treatise to which we have already alluded, its author has shown
by a series of unanswerable deductions, based on material gathered
from many sources both at home and abroad, that forced abortions in
America are of very frequent occurrence, and that this frequency
is rapidly increasing, not in the cities alone, but in the country
districts, where there is less excuse on the ground of excessive
expenditures, the claims of fashionable life, or an overcrowding of
the population. It was proved, for instance, that in one State that
was named, one of the wealthiest in the Union, the natural increase
of the population, or the excess of the births over the deaths, has
of late years been wholly by those of recent foreign origin. This was
the state of things existing in 1850; three years later it was evident
that the births in that commonwealth, with the usual increase, had
resulted in favor of foreign parents in an increased ratio. In other
words, it is found that, in so far as depends upon the American and
native element, and in the absence of the existing immigration from
abroad, the population of our older States, even allowing for the loss
by emigration, is stationary or decreasing.

The strange and otherwise unaccountable phenomenon to which we are now
referring, appears to have been first elucidated in a memoir, upon the
decrease of the rate of increase of population now obtaining in Europe
and America, read by the same author in 1858 to the American Academy
of Arts and Sciences, as a contribution to the science of political
economy. That paper, with all its mass of evidence, that as yet there
seems to have been no attempt to controvert, we find embodied in the
treatise to which I have referred, and which will prove of absorbing
interest to even the casual reader.

Thus it is seen that abortion is a crime not merely against the life of
the child and the health of its mother, and against good morals, but
that it strikes a blow at the very foundation of society itself.

One of the strange and unexpected results at which the author we have
so often referred to has arrived, but which he has both proved to a
demonstration and satisfactorily explained, is that abortions are
infinitely more frequent among Protestant women than among Catholic;
a fact, however, that becomes less unaccountable in view of the known
size, comparatively so great, of the families of the latter--in the
Irish, for instance--the point being that the different frequency of
the abortions depends not upon a difference in social position or in
fecundity, but in the religion. We should suppose _à priori_ that the
Protestant, especially if of New England and Puritan stock, would be
much the safer against all such assaults of the world, the flesh, and
the devil. The following is the concise and convincing solution of the
paradox that has been given:--

"It is not, of course, intended to imply that Protestantism, as such,
in any way encourages, or, indeed, permits the practice of inducing
abortion; its tenets are uncompromisingly hostile to all crime. So
great, however, is the popular ignorance regarding this offence, that
an abstract morality is here comparatively powerless; and there can
be no doubt that the Romish ordinance, flanked on the one hand by the
confessional, and by denouncement and excommunication on the other, has
saved to the world thousands of infant lives."[14]

There is another surprising result that must strike every candid
observer whose position gives him extended and frequent observation
of women, and of late years the study and treatment of their special
diseases has become so recognized that there are many physicians thus
rendered competent to judge; it is this, but a second one of the many
very frightful characteristics of induced abortion, that the act is
proportionately much more common in the married than in the unmarried
basing the calculation upon an equal number of pregnancies in each case.

This fact also may be easily accounted for. Abortion is undoubtedly
more common in the earlier than in the later months of pregnancy,
because the sensible signs of fœtal vitality are then less permanently
present, and the conscience is then better able to persuade itself that
the child may possibly be without life, or the alarm wholly a false
one. It is less common with first than with subsequent children, though
instances of its occurrence with the former are certainly not rare. A
woman who has never been pregnant does not, as a general rule, conceive
as readily as one who has already been impregnated before, perhaps
partly from the fact that intercourse, under certain circumstances, is
more likely to be excessive in such cases, at times producing acute or
subacute inflammation of the cervix uteri, and consequent sterility,
as is so constantly observed in prostitutes, very many of whom, upon
ceasing their trade, after accumulating a little property, as in
France, or upon being sent to out-lying colonies, as in England, and
becoming married, at once fall pregnant.

The unmarried woman, if _enceinte_, has not the opportunity of lying by
for a few days' sickness, without exciting suspicion, that the married
can easily seize for themselves. She is often not so conversant with
the early symptoms of gestation, and is more prone to wait until its
existence has been rendered certain by the sensation of quickening, in
the hope, doubtless, not unfrequently, that this certainty may persuade
her paramour to marriage, instead of deciding him against it, as is
so often the case. It may be allowed, I think, that infanticide, the
murder of a child after its birth, or its exposure to the vicissitudes
and perils of chance, is more common among the unmarried, but that
destruction of the fœtus in utero, the rather prevails where the rites
of law and religion would seem to have extended to that fœtus every
possible safeguard.

In the latest of the papers upon the subject of abortion, to which we
have already alluded, there is furnished additional evidence as to the
frequency of induced miscarriage.

"The infrequency of abortions," it is said, "as compared with labors
at the full period, is disproved by the experience of every physician
in special or large general practice, who will faithfully investigate
the subject. The truth of this statement has been fully verified, in
the instance of abortion criminally induced, by many of my professional
friends who were at first inclined to doubt the accuracy of my
inferences on that point; with reference to abortions more naturally
occurring, the evidence is of course more easily arrived at, and is in
consequence proportionately more striking. In many cases of sterility
it will be found that the number of abortions in a single patient have
been almost innumerable; and, it may be added, in a large proportion
of the cases of uterine disease occurring in the married, inquiry as
to their past history will reveal abortions, unsuspected perhaps even
by the family physician, as the cause. It is not so much the general
practitioner, the hospital attendant, or the accoucheur, as such, who
can testify as to the true frequency of abortion; for many cases,
even of the most deplorably fatal results, do not seek for medical
assistance at the time of the accident. The real balance sheet of these
cases is to be made out by the hands which are more especially called
to the treatment of chronic uterine disease."[15]

But not only is abortion of excessively frequent occurrence; the
nefarious practice is yearly extending, as does every vice that custom
and habit have rendered familiar. It is foolish to trust that a change
for the better may be spontaneously effected. "Longer silence and
waiting by the profession would be criminal. If these wretched women,
these married, lawful mothers, ay, and these Christian husbands, are
thus murdering their children by thousands through ignorance, they
must be taught the truth; but if, as there is reason to believe is
too often the case, they have been influenced to do so by fashion,
extravagance of living, or lust, no language of condemnation can be too
strong."[16]


VI.--_The Excuses and Pretexts that are given for the Act._

I have already stated that in many instances it is alleged by the
mother that she is ignorant of the true character of the act of wilful
abortion, and in some cases I am satisfied that the excuse is sincerely
given, although, in these days of the general diffusion of a certain
amount of physiological knowledge, such ignorance would seem incredible.

The above is, however, the only excuse that can be given with any show
of plausibility, and even this holds for nought should the case by any
chance come under the cognizance of the law, just as would a plea of
ignorance of the law itself; it being always taken for granted that
any intentional act implies a knowledge of its own nature and its
consequences, be these trivial or grave.

I have stated that in no case should abortion be permitted, or allowed
to be permitted, by the advice or approval of a single physician;
that in all cases where such counsel is taken, it should be from
a consultation of at least two competent men. Submitted to such a
tribunal, seldom indeed would the sanction be given.

Ill health would be no excuse, for there is hardly a conceivable case
where the invalidism could either not be relieved in some other mode,
or where by an abortion it would not be made worse.

The fear of childbed would be no excuse, for we have seen that its
risks are in reality less than those of an abortion, and its pains
and anguish can now be materially mitigated or entirely subdued
by anæsthesia, which the skill of medical science can induce, and
should induce, in every case of labor. My remarks apply not to first
pregnancies alone, when one might expect that women would naturally be
anxious and timid, but even to those cases of pregnancy that have been
preceded by difficult and dangerous labors.

It has been urged, and not so absurdly as would at first sight appear,
that the present possibilities of painless and so much safer delivery,
by changing thus completely the primal curse, from anguish to a state
frequently of positive pleasure, remove a drawback of actual advantage,
and, by offering too many inducements for pregnancy, tend to keep women
in that state the greater part of their menstrual lives.[17]

Much of the low morale of the community, as regards the guilt of
abortion, depends upon the very erroneous doctrines extensively
inculcated by popular authors and lecturers for their own sinister
purposes.

One of these is the doctrine that it is detrimental to a woman's
health to bear children beyond a certain number, or oftener than at
certain stated periods, and that any number of abortions are not merely
excusable, as preventives, but advisable; it being entirely forgotten
that the frequency of connection may be kept within bounds, and the
times of its occurrence regulated, by those who are not willing to
hazard its consequences; that if women will, to escape trouble, or
for fashion's sake, forego the duty and privilege of nursing,--a law
entailed upon them by nature, and seldom neglected without disastrous
results to their own constitutions,--they must expect more frequent
impregnation; that the habit of aborting is generally attended with the
habit of more readily conceiving; and that abortions, accidental, and
still more if induced, are generally attended by the loss of subsequent
health, if not of life.

This error is one which would justify abortion as necessary for the
mother's own good; a selfish plea. The other is based on a more
generous motive. It is, that the fewer one's children the more healthy
they are likely to be, and the more worth to society. It is, however,
equally fallacious with the first, and is without foundation in fact.
The Spartans and Romans, so confidently appealed to, gave birth
probably to as many weakly children as do our own women; that they
destroyed many for this reason, in infancy, is notorious. The brawny
Highlanders are not the only offspring of their parents; the others
cannot endure the national processes of hardening by exposure and diet,
and so die young from natural causes. But were this theory true even
so far as it goes, the world, our own country, could ill spare its
frailer children, who oftenest, perhaps, represent its intellect and
its genius.[18]


VII.--_Alternatives, Public and Private, and Measures of Relief._

It may be asked if there is no latitude to be allowed for extreme cases
of the character already described. We are compelled to answer, None.
If each woman were allowed to judge for herself in this matter, her
decision upon the abstract question would be too sure to be warped
by personal considerations, and those of the moment. Woman's mind is
prone to depression, and, indeed, to temporary actual derangement,
under the stimulus of uterine excitation, and this alike at the time of
puberty and the final cessation of the menses, at the monthly period
and at conception, during pregnancy, at labor, and during lactation;
a matter that also seems to have been more thoroughly investigated by
the authority I have so freely drawn from in reference to the question
of abortion, than by any other writer in this country.[19] During
the state of gestation the woman is therefore liable to thoughts,
convictions even, that at other times she would turn from in disgust or
dismay; and in this fact, that must be as familiar to herself as it is
to the physician, we find her most valid excuse for the crime.

Is there then no alternative but for women, when married and prone to
conception, to occasionally bear children? This, as we have seen, is
the end for which they are physiologically constituted and for which
they are destined by nature. In it lies their most efficient safeguard
for length of days and immunity from disease. Intentionally to prevent
the occurrence of pregnancy, otherwise than by total abstinence
from coition, intentionally to bring it, when begun, to a premature
close, are alike disastrous to a woman's mental, moral, and physical
well-being.

There are various alternatives to these so degrading habits of the
community. To some of them equal objections apply. But, in reality,
there is little difference between the immorality by which a man
forsakes his home for an occasional visit to a house of prostitution,
that he may preserve his wife from the chance of pregnancy, and the
immorality by which that wife brings herself wilfully to destroy the
living fruit of her womb. Allowing for the weakness and frailty of
human nature, the first were surely the preferable of the twain. But
we need not compare these odious customs, each so common and each so
wrong. With greater frugality of living, and greater self-denial, and
self-control in more trivial matters, there need be no interference,
at least no intentional interference, on the part of either husband
or wife with the first great law of human weal and human happiness, in
accordance with which, by the divine institution of home and its mutual
joys, the due propagation and natural increase of the species was
intended to be insured.

Were well-arranged foundling hospitals provided in all our large
cities, they would prove a most efficient means of preventing
the sacrifice of hundreds of the children of shame, and, so far
from encouraging immorality, they would afford one of its surest
preventives, for by keeping a woman from the crime of infanticide or
the equally guilty intentional miscarriage, they would save her from
one element of the self-condemnation and hatred which so often hurry
the victim of seduction downward to the life of the brothel. A certain
amount of illicit intercourse between the sexes will always take place,
no matter how condemned by law, until the public standard of morals
shall be so elevated as to render the practice unknown. This is a fact
that is self-evident, and cannot be frowned out of existence. How
much better to provide for its innocent victims, its irresponsible
offspring, than, as now, to permit the so frequent destruction of both.
It is foolish to assert that by such provision we but pander to sin.
In many of these instances the woman is innocent of intentional wrong,
being led astray by her perfect confidence in the constancy and good
faith of a lover, and in others she is, doubtless, ignorant of the true
character of the act she is committing. Should she be driven by what is
comparatively a venial, and not so unnatural an offence, to one of the
deadliest crimes?

But for the married, who have not this strong stimulus of necessity,
and the excuse of having been led astray or deceived, there need be no
public channel provided, through which to purchase safety for their
children. Is it not, indeed, inconceivable that the very women, who,
when their darlings of a month old, or a year, are snatched from them
by disease, find the parting attended with so acute a pang, can so
deliberately provide for, and congratulate themselves and each other,
upon a wilful abortion! Here, words fail us.

"Of the mother, by consent or by her own hand, imbrued with her
infant's blood; of the equally guilty father, who counsels or allows
the crime; of the wretches, who by their wholesale murders, far
out-Herod Burke and Hare; of the public sentiment which palliates,
pardons, and would even praise this, so common, violation of all law,
human and divine, of all instinct, all reason, all pity, all mercy, all
love, we leave those to speak who can."[20]


VIII.--_Recapitulation._

We have now seen that the induction of a forced abortion is, in
reality, a crime against the infant, its mother, the family circle, and
society; that it is attended with extreme danger, whether immediate
or remote, to the mother's happiness, to her health, mental and
physical, and to her life; that there is, in reality, no valid excuse
for it that can be urged, save when it has been decided to be an
absolute necessity by two competent medical men, and that there are
alternatives, such as greater temperance and frugality of living,
which, if practised, would be equally for the public and for private
good.

We have also seen that not only is abortion wrong, no matter from
what quarter we contemplate the act, but so also is the deliberate
prevention of pregnancy in the married alike detrimental to the
health and to the moral sense. Moderation and temperance here, as
elsewhere, afford the golden rule. Under the circumstances to which I
allude, total abstinence may, as far as the health is concerned, be as
injurious as is the other extreme of excessive indulgence. To the woman
in good bodily condition, occasional child-bearing is an important
means of healthful self-preservation; to the invalid, an intentional
miscarriage is no means of cure; if she be in poor health, let her seek
aid and relief in the proper quarter, but not, by thus tampering with
natural and physiological laws, alike imperilling both body and soul.

Were woman intended as a mere plaything, or for the gratification of
her own or her husband's desires, there would have been need for her
of neither uterus nor ovaries, nor would the prevention of their being
used for their clearly legitimate purpose have been attended by such
tremendous penalties as is in reality the case.

We have seen that in a perverted and mistaken public opinion lies the
secret of the whole matter. "Ladies boast to each other of the impunity
with which they have aborted, as they do of their expenditures, of
their dress, of their success in society. There is a fashion in this,
as in all other female customs, good and bad. The wretch whose account
with the Almighty is heaviest with guilt, too often becomes a heroine.
So truly is this the case, that the woman who dares at the present day,
publicly or privately, to acknowledge it the holiest duty of her sex to
bring forth living children, 'that first, highest, and in earlier times
almost universal lot,'[21] is worthy, and should receive, the highest
admiration and praise."[22]

We have seen that it is no trifling matter, this awful waste of human
life. It is a subject that demands the best efforts of the whole
medical profession, both as a body and as men, whose every relation
its members are alike best able to appreciate, to understand, and to
advise concerning. "Physicians alone," says Prof. Hodge, "can rectify
public opinion; they alone can present the subject in such a manner
that legislators can exercise their powers aright in the preparation
of suitable laws; that moralists and theologians can be furnished with
facts to enforce the truth upon the moral sense of the community, so
that not only may the crime of infanticide be abolished, but criminal
abortion properly reprehended; and that women in every rank and
condition of life may be made sensible of the value of the fœtus, and
of the high responsibility which rests upon its parents."[23]

"If the community were made to understand and to feel that marriage,
where the parties shrink from its highest responsibilities, is nothing
less than legalized prostitution, many would shrink from their present
public confession of cowardly, selfish, and sinful lust. If they were
taught, by the speech and daily practice of their medical attendants,
that a value attaches to the unborn child, hardly increased by the
accident of its birth, they also would be persuaded or compelled to a
similar belief in its sanctity, and to a commensurate respect."[24]

We have seen that the above is the deliberate decision of those who,
from their observation and knowledge of the subject, are best able to
judge. "Whatever estimate may attach to our opinion," says an eminent
medical journalist, "we believe that not only ought these things not
so to be, but that the public should know it from good authority. For
ourselves, we have no fear that the truth, in reference to the crime
of procuring abortion, would do aught but good. It would appear that
sheer ignorance, in many honest people, is the spring of the horrible
intra-uterine murder which exists among us; why not, then, enlighten
this ignorance? It would be far more effectually done by some bold and
manly appeal than by the scattered influence of honorable practitioners
alone. Will not the mischief, by and by, be all the more deadly for
delaying exposure and attempting relief?"[25]

We have also seen that "it might be, it very likely would be, for our
immediate pecuniary interest, as a profession, to preserve silence; for
we have shown that abortions, of all causes, tend to break down and
ruin the health of the community at large. But to harbor this thought,
even for a moment, were dishonorable."[26]

                   *       *       *       *       *

This subject, at all times so important for the consideration of the
people at large, is invested with unusual interest at a period like
the present, when, at the close of a long and closely contested war,
greater fields for human development and success are opened than ever
before. All the fruitfulness of the present generation, tasked to its
utmost, can hardly fill the gaps in our population that have of late
been made by disease and the sword, while the great territories of the
far West, just opening to civilization, and the fertile savannas of the
South, now disinthralled and first made habitable by freemen, offer
homes for countless millions yet unborn. Shall they be filled by our
own children or by those of aliens? This is a question that our own
women must answer; upon their loins depends the future destiny of the
nation.

In the hope that the present appeal may do somewhat to stem the tide
of fashion and depraved public opinion; that it may tend to persuade
our women that forced abortions are alike unchristian, immoral, and
physically detrimental; that it may dissipate the ignorance concerning
the existence of fœtal life that so extensively prevails, and be the
means of promoting the ratio of increase of our national population, so
unnaturally kept down, the National Medical Association addresses
itself to all American mothers; for thus, in the closing words of
the Essay from which I have so frequently and so freely drawn, would
"the profession again be true to its mighty and responsible office of
shutting the great gates of human death."


                               APPENDIX.

In the prefatory remarks attention was called to the fact that the
writer may have incidentally expressed personal opinions of his
own, in the course of his Essay, that are not fully coincided in by
every member of the medical profession, and reference was made to
correspondence that had already occurred in connection with this
subject. This correspondence is now presented, and will explain itself.

It will be noticed that I withhold the name of the gentleman who
addressed me, this being done at his own particular request, though
I would willingly have given him opportunity publicly to assume
the position against anæsthetics in childbed, so long held by his
illustrious townsman, Prof. Meigs. Discretion, however, has thus far
been found, by the opponents of anæsthesia, to be the better part of
valor. In a subsequent letter, under date of February 19, my friend
writes me as follows: "When the pamphlet appears, I will aid you to my
utmost ability in its circulation, and believe it will be productive of
eminent good."

The criticism referred to is as follows:


                                        "+PHILADELPHIA+, Feb. 10, 1866.

  "+MY DEAR DOCTOR+:

 "Your Essay gives much satisfaction to all who have read it, of
 course, a very select few (the book being still in the printer's
 hands), but several have most strenuously objected to one or two
 points, inasmuch as the profession are to take hold of the matter and
 endeavor to place it in the hands of their female patients. The only
 one concerning which I have deemed it necessary to write you, is your
 remark relative to the use of anæsthesia in all cases of labor. Now,
 Doctor, though many are fully with you, yet many would object most
 decidedly; in fact, it is by special request that I now ask you to
 omit, if possible, those few lines. Some of our profession--I believe
 many more would if they had read the Essay--object to placing it in
 the hands of their patients, and thus condemning their own action and
 advice. Many in this city, to my positive knowledge, object to the
 use of anæsthesia in labor, _in toto_. Many others only use it in
 special cases. While the number of those who use or advise it in all
 cases is _very, very_ small. I am satisfied the omission of these few
 lines would give great satisfaction, and remove almost entirely all
 objections to the paper.

 "I had not the pleasure of reading it prior to seeing the proof, and
 must express to you my congratulations for your success. Nothing
 pleased me so much as the gratification so pleasantly expressed
 by your good father, as he so unexpectedly found his son to be the
 essayist. For that reason, I am much pleased that you requested, 'for
 a whim,' to have the seals broken upon the platform.

                                                       "Very sincerely,
                                                          "Your friend,
                                                           "---- ----."

To the above letter I thus replied:


                                "+HOTEL PELHAM, BOSTON+, 12 Feb., 1866.

  "+MY DEAR DOCTOR+:

 "I have received your kind letter of the 10th inst., and am glad you
 have spoken so frankly. I should be delighted to grant the request
 thus courteously made, were it possible for me consistently or
 conscientiously to do so.

 "This subject of anæsthesia in labor is one to which, for now thirteen
 years, I have given earnest attention, and is one of the most
 important that has ever presented itself to medical men.

 "It is my sincere conviction that the use of anæsthetics in childbed
 is not only indicated by every consideration of humanity, but that
 it serves materially to lessen the average rate of mortality to both
 mother and child.

 "Previously to the present date my voice has given no uncertain sound
 upon this question. I send you, by to-day's mail, a copy of my little
 book, "Eutokia," which, two or three years since, excited some
 attention from the profession, both at home and abroad, and has made,
 I am happy to know, many converts to the true faith.

 "If you will turn to the preface of the American edition of my
 Simpson's Obstetrics, published in 1855, you will find upon page xvi.
 the following language, none of which, in the added experience and
 reflection of all these years, can I honestly retract. 'But yesterday,
 and the man who dared give ether or chloroform in labor was considered
 as breaking alike the laws of nature and of God; the time is probably
 close at hand when such will be said of all who withhold them, even in
 natural labor.'

 "In the present instance, the Essay has been carefully scrutinized by
 a Committee of the Association,--that on Prize Essays,--and has been
 unqualifiedly approved. It has been accepted by the Association, has
 been ordered to be printed, and, by special vote, to be pushed to the
 most extended circulation possible, in the belief that its influence
 would be only for the highest good of the community. I am always
 responsible at the bar of professional opinion for any sentiment that
 I may utter, and avow none that I am not prepared to defend. If any
 gentleman differs from me in opinion, let him carefully prepare an
 essay upon the subject, present it to the Association, and, if they so
 decide, I will cheerfully vote that it also be presented to the people
 as a rejoinder to myself.

 "With all respect for those who think otherwise, I cannot omit or
 change one word of the Essay, and have no right to do so if I would.

 "As the present, however, is a point that, though only incidentally
 mentioned, yet involves some conflict of professional opinion, while
 the Association are of a single mind as to the matter of Criminal
 Abortion, I shall cheerfully append your letter to the published
 edition, and thus save your associates from any implied credit or
 discredit of indorsing my own opinion. This course will be unnecessary
 with regard to the Transactions, as the Association is known to be
 irresponsible for any views advanced by its members, save when adopted
 by special resolution, and its volume does not reach the parties in
 reality most interested, namely, the parturient women, whose anguish,
 so far as such may be unnecessary, it should be our highest duty to
 relieve.

 "Thanking you for the generally favorable opinion you convey to me for
 yourself and those for whom you write, for I always value the approval
 of my friends next to my own self-respect,

                                                "I am yours, sincerely,
                                                  "+HORATIO R. STORER+.

   "+DR.+ ---- ----."

                   *       *       *       *       *


                   _A Companion to "John Halifax."_

                             JUST ISSUED,

                               IN TRUST:

                                  OR,

                       DR. BERTRAND'S HOUSEHOLD.

                     +BY MISS AMANDA M. DOUGLASS.+

                    1 vol. 12mo.      Price $1.75.

We can give no better idea of the scope and ability of this volume,
than by quoting the opinion of the Northampton Free Press, which is
noted for its free and impartial criticisms.

"It is a work of which we can hardly speak too warmly in commendation.
It is deeply interesting, even fascinating, but it is also ennobling,
free from any false sentimentality, but beautiful in its narrative of
the high and pure life of Richard Bertrand. As a family history we
have never met with its equal; the portraiture is vivid, yet not too
highly colored, and the reader feels that he is looking upon a scene in
actual life rather than the marvels of a fiction. Richard Bertrand is
not one of those natures actuated by violent passions, not such a one
as Victor Hugo would make the hero of a novel, but a young man always
ready to respond to the call of duty--patient and earnest, loving and
true, unselfish and enduring, in his position as elder brother in a
family, who could look to him alone for earthly support, displaying
all the characteristics of a healthful and well-proportioned Christian
life. It is a book which every young man should read; he will be the
better for its perusal, a correct sense of manliness and of
the nobility of suffering will be enhanced by it. It is a good book to
read in the family, although a better one to read and reflect upon in
solitude. It is one which every parent will gladly place in the hands
of his children, confident that there is nothing in its pages that can
injure, but much that can benefit the reader."

--> Sent by mail, post paid, on receipt of price, and sold by all
booksellers.


             +LEE & SHEPARD+, Publishers and Booksellers,
                   _149 Washington Street, Boston_.

                   *       *       *       *       *


                  _A Domestic Story of Great Beauty._

                          A THOUSAND A YEAR.

                                  BY

                          +MRS.+ E. M. BRUCE.

                      _1 vol. 16mo. Price $1.25._

The story of a clergyman who left his country home to seek fortune with
a city parish and One Thousand a Year.

                   *       *       *       *       *

                        _A Valuable Home Book._

                       TALKS ON WOMEN'S TOPICS.

                           +BY+ JENNIE JUNE.

                      _1 vol. 12mo. Price $1.75._

Those who keep up with the current newspaper literature are somewhat
acquainted with the wit and wisdom of Jennie June. This handsome volume
is a collection of her writings, and consists of familiar "Talks" on
a great variety of subjects, all more or less connected with women
and the household, and includes chapters on "Matrimony," "Babies,"
"Courtship," "Girls," and various other subjects. The style of
treatment is especially to be commended: it is witty, without vulgarity
or coarseness; sensible, without being in the least prosy. It is
penetrated, moreover, by a vein of womanly tenderness and earnestness,
which shows deep feeling and strong conviction beneath the veil of
good-natured satire. "Talks on Women's Topics" is a capital gift-book,
just the one that a man would like to take to his wife in the country,
or present to his daughter;--there is not a word that is objectionable,
while there is much that will help to make better wives, daughters, and
mothers.

--> Sent by mail, post paid, on receipt
of price.


                     +LEE & SHEPARD+, Publishers,
                   _149 Washington Street, Boston_.

                   *       *       *       *       *


                         _A Remarkable Book._

                                HERMAN:
                                  OR,
                           YOUNG KNIGHTHOOD.

We publish below the deliberate and carefully expressed opinions of
critics, whose judgments are matured by years of research.

 "We know of no work of fiction so full as this of beauty and wisdom,
 so free from folly, so resplendent with intellectual life and moral
 purity."--_Atlantic Monthly for Feb._

 "There is still a balm in Gilead, and some hope for novel writing
 in America." "The evidence of a genius of no common order." "In
 novel writing quite as much rests on the insight displayed in the
 development of character and the clever working up of special passages
 as upon the general effect. And here the author shines."--_Round
 Table._

 "The strength of the work is its moral purity and elevation.
 The depth and earnestness of nature exhibited in the conception
 of Herman's character are worthy of the profoundest respect and
 admiration."--_Boston Advertiser._

 "We recognize in this book one of the ablest of American
 novels."--_Evening Post, N. Y._

 "Herman is a book on which a mind of exceedingly rich and varied
 ambitions has lavished itself without stint."--_Portland Press._

 "This book is worthy of the encomiums that have been lavished upon
 it."--_Springfield Union._

 "It is a gushing, outspoken narrative of individual
 experience."--_Commonwealth, Boston._

 "This is one of the most notable books of the season."--_Boston Post._

 "A book not likely to be laid aside among the crowd of ephemeral
 issues of the press."--_Presbyterian, Phila._

The above are samples of a large number of equally strong
communications.

                    2 vols. 12mo.      Price $3.50.

.*. Sent by mail on receipt of price.

             +LEE & SHEPARD+, Publishers and Booksellers,
                   _149 Washington Street, Boston_.

                   *       *       *       *       *


                          _A New Fruit Book._

                PRACTICAL AND SCIENTIFIC FRUIT CULTURE.

                                  BY

           _CHARLES R. BAKER_, Of the Dorchester Nurseries.

           _1 vol. 8vo. Profusely Illustrated. Price $4.00._

A work of rare excellence, which is destined to take its place beside
the best works on American Pomology. Its author is extensively and
favorably known among fruit-growers, both as a skilful pomologist and
a ripe scholar, and is every way qualified for the preparation of a
book on this his favorite subject. In fruit culture he was educated by
Hon. Marshall P. Wilder, of world-wide fame, with whom he is at present
associated as business partner, and to whose valuable library and ripe
experience he has had the freest access for many years.

In this volume he gives no delineations or descriptions of Fruits, but
treats with exhaustive fulness the arts of production and cultivation,
together with the scientific principles on which these arts depend;
how persons may supply themselves with the best fruits in variety
and abundance, with the least labor and expense, and in the shortest
possible space of time.

No family, no cultivator can do without this book, which will save them
many times its cost every year.

.*. Sent by mail, post paid, on receipt
of price, and for sale by all booksellers.


             +LEE & SHEPARD+, Publishers and Booksellers,
                   _149 Washington Street, Boston_.

                   *       *       *       *       *


                    _Oliver Optic in a New Field._

                         THE WAY OF THE WORLD.

                              +A NOVEL.+

               +BY+ WILLIAM T. ADAMS, (+OLIVER OPTIC+.)

Under his _nom de plume_ of "Oliver Optic," Mr. Adams has acquired an
enviable fame as writer of juvenile books. Always teaching a wholesome
lesson under cover of an attractive story, his books are welcome guests
in every household.

His "Army and Navy Stories," six in number, viz., "The Soldier Boy,"
"The Sailor Boy," "The Young Lieutenant," "The Yankee Middy," "Fighting
Joe," and "Brave Old Salt," have already reached a sale of fifty
thousand copies, while the total sale of his books during the last year
alone reaches one hundred thousand copies.

That so prolific and pleasing a writer will be equally successful in
his new field of enterprise none can doubt who have witnessed the
eagerness with which his juvenile books have been seized and read by
the "old people" as well as the "young folks."


                     +LEE & SHEPARD+, Publishers,
                   _149 Washington Street, Boston_.

                   *       *       *       *       *

[Footnote 1: "The preamble and resolution were signed by Philo Tillson,
President, and S. L. Andrews, Secretary, of the Northeastern District
Medical Association of Michigan, as having been adopted by that
Association, at its annual meeting, held on the 19th day of May, 1864,
and which its delegate, Dr. Stockwell, was instructed to present to the
Association."--_Trans. Am. Med. Association_, 1864, p. 60.]

[Footnote 2: Now that the decision of the Prize Committee has been
made, the purpose of the above stipulation becomes evident. The
Committee consisted of Drs. D. Humphreys Storer, Henry I. Bowditch, J.
Mason Warren, and John H. Dix, of Boston; the Chairman of the Committee
being the writer's father.]

[Footnote 3: The Committee consisted of Drs. H. R. Storer, of Boston;
T. W. Blatchford, of Troy, N. Y.; H. L. Hodge, of Philadelphia; C. A.
Pope, of St. Louis; Barton, of South Carolina; A. Lopez, of Mobile; and
W. H. Brisbane, of Arena, Wis.]

[Footnote 4: Studies of Abortion; Boston Medical and Surgical Journal,
February 5, 1863.]

[Footnote 5: Transactions of the American Medical Association, 1859,
vol. xii. p. 75.]

[Footnote 6: Percival: Medical Ethics, p. 79.]

[Footnote 7: Man Transformed, Oxford, 1653.]

[Footnote 8: Regina _v._ Wycherly, 8 Carrington and Payne, 265.]

[Footnote 9: Criminal Abortion in America, p. 5.]

[Footnote 10: Owen: Cyclopædia of Anatomy and Physiology, vol. iii. p.
322.]

[Footnote 11: Naegele: Treatise on Obstetric Auscultation, p. 50.]

[Footnote 12: Studies of Abortion: Boston Medical and Surgical Journal,
February 5, 1863.]

[Footnote 13: Criminal Abortion in America, p. 42.]

[Footnote 14: Essay on Criminal Abortion, p. 42.]

[Footnote 15: Studies of Abortion, &c.]

[Footnote 16: Essay on Criminal Abortion, p. 106.]

[Footnote 17: Essay on Criminal Abortion, p. 34.]

[Footnote 18: Essay on Criminal Abortion, p. 32.]

[Footnote 19: H. R. Storer: The Causation, Course, and Treatment of
Insanity in Women; a gynæcist's idea thereof. Transactions of the
American Medical Association, vol. xvi., 1865.]

[Footnote 20: Essay on Criminal Abortion, p. 13.]

[Footnote 21: A Woman's Thoughts about Women. By the author of "John
Halifax, Gentleman," p. 14.]

[Footnote 22: Essay on Criminal Abortion, p. 55.]

[Footnote 23: Introductory Lecture at University of Pennsylvania, 1854,
p. 19.]

[Footnote 24: Essay, &c., p. 101.]

[Footnote 25: Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, editorial, December
13, 1855.]

[Footnote 26: Essay, &c., p. 106.]

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 65701 ***